Knowledge in the 21st Century

by Storm International December 2, 2008

My mid-week reflection covers a topic that is the future and has been recognised as being so over the last decade or two. The area is knowledge and what it means to today’s organizations. Increasingly so in the Western World and globally knowledge is driving change, economic output and the fast economic developments we are seeing in numerous industries. It is also promoting rapid industrialization of Less Developed Countries around the world.

However, it is the ability to manage that knowledge that will determine its best use. The old adage of ‘Knowledge is power’ is true but only if it is managed properly and put to good use.
Any knowledge within a company must be:
1.       Accessible fast
2.       Enable the latest in thinking
3.       Allow for better sharing of that knowledge
4.       Facilitate the knowledge of who is doing what
A lot of valuable knowledge is tacit and sits within the grey matter of a company’s people. When a person leaves for whatever reason then that knowledge is lost. It is the ability of a business to capture, store, share and utilize that tacit knowledge that will enable it to have a certain competitive advantage.
You take the knowledge held within the specialists that reside within many companies, how often do they share their knowledge or how often have they been asked to share their knowledge for the collective good of the business.
I have come across situations where many individuals take training provided, practice the training in a live environment, improvise their learning and keep that new enhanced knowledge to themselves. Yes! There are some people who may be selfish and want to retain the upper hand in case they face redundancy. Yet! I would criticize the company for not encouraging the development of knowledge and then sharing it amongst colleagues and peers.
By bringing the knowledge of an organizations people into the open the benefits would be increased efficiency and effectiveness:
1.       Development of new ideas
2.       Rapid resolution to problems
3.       New starters hit the ground running
4.       Eliminate waste through duplication and re-invention of the wheel
These are some of the transitional benefits to be had whereas if the organization was to go further and investigate ways to make knowledge key to business survival then knowledge can impact key business goals and productivity.
Many companies have a knowledge management expert with databases full of information gathered for the knowledge base. In reality how often do these get looked at and how informative are they. Plus, not every person learns by reading an article or a manual. The key is having different media to capture and share that knowledge. Take Wikipedia for example it allows anyone to amend its content. YouTube is another excellent example of how knowledge can be shared. Social networking sites enable people to get connected and share ideas, discuss and debate.
Any of these and other novel ways can be replicated for use within a business, leading to further benefits such as:
1.       Faster innovation
2.       Improved customer service
3.       Reduce knowledge loss
4.       Increased productivity / performance
So it is up to all companies to ensure knowledge is valued and it is used to develop new products, services and smarter ways to work.
 
Shah Alam

Comments

2/10/2009 8:16:14 AM #

I am "addicted" to OpenSource Softwares and I was for a long time partly involved in the OpenSource community in Belgium.

What Shah Alam underlines here is interesting and relevant. I would like to share some of observation out of my experience with OpenSource.

At the very beginning, and still today, OpenSource is all about knowledge and knowledge sharing. With source code opened, everyone can of course read, correct and/or improve softwares. That leads to forks or new softwares also. Reactivity is high in fixing bugs, new functionalities are often created, creativity can be expressed.

On the other hand, having source code opened gives the opportunity to people that are curious to learn from the code, and therefore from the experience of someone else. In the OpenSource Community, not only the code is open, usually documentation is free and abundant, and we can't count the number of forums or blogs where people are sharing their experience.

What I underline out of my experience is :
- that, if condition exists, only the person with the desire to learn will learn
- that this person will probably learn only about its passion
- that sharing knowledge and experience speed up development of news

At the same time, if we only open the knowledge, most of the reader will only have one dimension: they can be very rich in term of IT for example but will be poor in terms of ethic, philosophy, general culture, language... We know that creativity and/or intelligence is the fruit of a multi-disciplinary approach. Each enhances the other discipline.

Another problem is: what about people that don't invest time in knowledge?

I am observing today that, probably because everyone has access to television or WWW, everyone believes that he understands the world. Everyone thinks he is right and everyone has an opinion about anything. From my point of view, it looks like the reign of mediocrity. And this is this mediocrity that we cross in companies and/or in our citizen societies.

If we want to have successful organization or companies, of course knowledge should be kept and opened. At the same time, workers and employees should commit themselves on a annual goal in term of knowledge increase. On top of that, companies should also supervise knowledge development in order to ensure that :
- knowledge acquired by people is relevant and consistent
- this knowledge is grounded on a firm and pluri-disciplinarian basis

My last word will be a question: what about competitive knowledge?
There is two way to answer this question and therefore two consequences. At the end, man should choice.
- This knowledge is kept closed; it is only partly shared with people that have a role to play in the process. At the end, companies will probably cash immediately higher revenues, but its technological development could be hampered. From the Societal point of view, that leads to poverty as citizen ca'nt take benefit of scientific or technical improvements.
- This knowledge is open; therefore competition is widely open too. What about R&D investment then? Obviously, a new economical and a new business model should be found. This is what IT has succeeded with OpenSource Software. May be should we start to teach this model also in our business schools.

Philippe Beaujean Morocco

Add comment




  Country flag

biuquote
Loading



Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.5.0.7
Contents Copyrighted by Storm International - Improving Manufacturing Efficiency Worldwide

About Us

We are a young and dynamic change management implementation consultancy and have been in business since 2004. Headquartered in the USA we have associates operating in Europe, Middle East and Asia. Visit our corporate site at www.storm-international.us.

RecentPosts

Calendar

<<  February 2012  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728291234
567891011

View posts in large calendar
Protected by Commentor
29 comments approved
437 spam caught
Since December 1, 2008
Powered by Spam Counter